AI Content Policy

Last updated:

We believe in full transparency about how our content is created. This policy explains our use of AI writing tools, the role of human editors, and the standards we apply to all published material.

Our Commitment to Transparency

YesNoWheelApp uses AI language tools to assist in the research, drafting, and editing of content. We disclose this openly because we believe readers deserve to know how the content they read is produced.

This is not a confession — it is a transparency statement. AI tools help us research more thoroughly, write more consistently, and cover more topics. But every piece of content we publish is reviewed, edited, and approved by a human team member before it reaches you.

What AI Does in Our Workflow

AI tools play a supporting role in our content production. Specifically, we use AI to:

  • Research assistance: Summarizing academic literature on decision-making psychology, cognitive biases, and behavioral science.
  • Initial drafting: Generating first drafts of articles, which are then heavily edited by human writers.
  • Structural suggestions: Proposing outlines, headings, and FAQ questions for editorial review.
  • Proofreading: Checking grammar, clarity, and readability before final publication.
  • Code assistance: Generating and reviewing code for our interactive tools.

What AI Does NOT Do

There are clear limits on how we use AI in our content process:

  • AI does not make editorial decisions. What we cover, how we frame topics, and what advice we give is decided by humans.
  • AI does not publish content. No article reaches our site without a human reviewing and approving it.
  • AI does not verify facts. All factual claims, research citations, and statistics are checked by a human editor against primary or authoritative sources.
  • AI does not replace expertise. Our content draws on genuine knowledge of decision psychology, UX research, and behavioral science — AI only assists in expressing that knowledge clearly.

Human Review Process

Every article on YesNoWheelApp goes through the following human review before publication:

  1. Accuracy check: Factual claims are verified against credible sources. Anything that cannot be verified is removed or qualified.
  2. Quality assessment: The reviewer asks: "Does this article genuinely help the reader? Is it better than what already exists online?" If not, the article is revised.
  3. Originality review: AI-generated drafts tend toward generic phrasing. Human editors replace generic passages with specific examples, real scenarios, and original insights.
  4. Tone and voice: Our editorial voice is direct, informative, and practical. Reviewers correct AI tendency toward padding, hedging, and repetition.
  5. Final approval: A team member signs off on the article before it is published.

Why We Use AI Tools

We are a small team covering a broad topic — decision-making psychology, interactive tools, and practical guides for everyday choices. AI tools allow us to:

  • Produce content at a scale that would otherwise require a much larger team
  • Research topics more thoroughly by synthesizing academic sources quickly
  • Maintain consistent quality standards across a large content library
  • Focus human editorial energy on judgment, accuracy, and original thinking — the things AI cannot reliably do

The alternative — publishing no content or publishing thin, rushed content without AI assistance — would serve our readers worse. We believe the right approach is to use AI as a tool, not as a replacement for editorial judgment.

Content Quality Standards

Regardless of how content is produced, every article published on YesNoWheelApp must meet the same standards:

  • Factually accurate and verifiable
  • Genuinely helpful to the reader
  • Original in perspective and examples
  • Free of filler, padding, or repetition
  • Written in clear, accessible language

If an AI-drafted article does not meet these standards, it is revised until it does — or it is not published.

Reporting Concerns

If you believe any content on our site is inaccurate, misleading, or does not meet the standards described in this policy, please contact us via our Contact page. We take every report seriously and will investigate promptly.

See also our Editorial Policy and Corrections Policy for related information.